Blog

Welcome to our blog.

Looking for something specific?
Enter your keywords in the searchbar below.

 

1 minute Martini Manna

Guest User Guest User

The Court of Cassation on the infringement of the Rolex designs

In Judgment No. 24006/2023, the Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal of Swift Company S.r.l. against Rolex S.A. and Rolex Italia S.p.A., which had accused it of producing and marketing bracelets purportedly inspired by Rolex watch bezels and bearing the MGT sign, allegedly confusable with Rolex's GMT Master trademark.

Read More
Guest User Guest User

Italian draft law on AI and its copyright implications

On 23 April 2024, the government approved a draft law to introduce provisions on artificial intelligence (AI). The draft law emphasises that the lifecycle of AI systems and models must respect the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals enshrined in Italian and European law.

Read More
Margherita Stucchi Margherita Stucchi

The Green Claims Directive

On 26 March 2024, the EU Directive 2024/825, which concerns "empowering consumers for the green transition through better protection against unfair practices and through better information" came into force. It amends Directives 2005/29/EC (unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices) and 2011/83/EU (consumer rights).

Read More
Guest User Guest User

EPDB adopts an opinion on consent/payment models of online platforms

The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) has issued an opinion on the circumstances and conditions under which 'consent or payment' models, relating to behavioral advertising, may be implemented by large online platforms in a way that constitutes valid and freely given consent.

Read More
Guest User Guest User

AGCM interrupts the sale of the “Hot Chip Challenge”

In November 2023, the Antitrust Authority opened an investigation against the company DAVE'S S.r.l., distributor in Italy of the product called the "Hot Chip Challenge", which involved consuming an extremely spicy and unpleasant tasting crisp. The Authority argued that the company had engaged in conduct in violation of the Consumer Code.

Read More